For more information about our research offerings or to request a briefing from one of our analysts, please e-mail our Client Director team or call us at:
+1-214-451-3110
+91-124-304-1000
+44-870-770-0270
For assistance with accessing the web site or research subscription materials, please e-mail our support group.
March 13, 2007
DALLAS, March 13, 2007 - Infrastructure outsourcing suppliers that employ the traditional model will face steadily declining revenues as early as 2009, according to a new study by the Everest Research Institute. This is the result of companies continuing to sign shorterterm IT outsourcing contracts that retain ownership of their assets but allow remote infrastructure support.
Although the traditional Infrastructure Outsourcing (IO) revenue decline trend is predicted to be slow, suppliers must develop new strategies to grow their businesses, according to Growth of Infrastructure Management Outsourcing (IMO). The report is one of a four-report series that provides a comprehensive examination of the IO market trends and dynamics.
“We will continue to see steady growth of IT infrastructure outsourcing, but the predictable continued cannibalization of the traditional model in favor of IMO solutions will compel suppliers to decide which IO model is most appropriate for their businesses,” said Ross Tisnovsky, Vice President of the Institute’s ITO Research Group. “Traditional suppliers can slow down the adoption of IMO by expanding their traditional model offerings to take advantage of offshore labor arbitrage or compete by adopting key aspects of the IMO model that might jeopardize prospects of pure-plays but allow the IMO market to expand faster.”
The Institute analyzed four key market forces driving IMO growth:
Selecting Locations for Remote Infrastructure Management Report
The second report released this week as part of the IO study series, Selecting Locations for Remote Infrastructure Management, provides insights to companies regarding what countries and cities they should consider based on their individual infrastructure outsourcing needs. According to the Institute’s work, commonly used Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and number of IT graduates alone are deceptive measurement tools to determine where an
infrastructure outsourcing center should be hosted.
“Whereas most other location identification processes only measure GDP and IT graduates, companies must consider factors such as a country’s technology installed base, its IT expenditures and IT infrastructure resources,” said Tisnovsky. “This study takes you through our propriety location optimization process that derives an IT-centric GDP and other economic factors for countries located within applicable time zones. For example, being on complementary time zones, such as North America and Latin American or Europe and Africa, is very important for infrastructure outsourcing, versus other outsourcing services that work on a “follow-the-sun approach” such as North America and India.”
Applying the Institute’s methodology, 23 countries meet the minimum criteria for delivery centers. Company-specific location recommendations are finalized based upon several company-centric business factors, such as the location of a company’s existing outsourcing provider or local offices.
ITO Market Update Report Series
The four-part Information Technology Outsourcing (ITO) Market Update report series includes two studies published last month. Infrastructure Outsourcing Roadmap provides insights into the benefits of Remote Infrastructure Management Outsourcing (RIMO) for buyers and discusses suppliers’ challenges in meeting new trend demands. The Asset-light Outsourcing Model study offers insights into one of the most important drivers of changes in
the IO market – the IT asset ownership trends in an infrastructure outsourcing deal.