search:

Research Areas

More information 

For more information about our research offerings or to request a briefing from one of our analysts, please e-mail our Client Director team or call us at:

+1-214-451-3110

+91-124-304-1000

+44-870-770-0270

 

Customer support 

For assistance with accessing the web site or research subscription materials, please e-mail our support group.

Pricing Structures in PO - Ensuring "Win-Win" Solutions

November 2009
Saurabh Gupta, Abhishek Menon, Katrina Menzigian
ID: ERI-2009-1-R-0371
42 pages

Price: $2,999 (USD)
download preview
add to cart
email a colleague

 

Introduction

Procurement Outsourcing (PO) is different from other BPOs in that it addresses a large cost base in terms of non-core procurement spend as opposed to only the operational and functional spend that most BPOs target. While this creates a significant savings potential, it also renders the PO process complex and challenging. Consequently, the pricing strategy in PO becomes a critical component to ensure the right behavior from both buyer and supplier leading to win-win solution for all stakeholders.

The objective in this study was to uncover the latest trends in pricing structures prevalent in PO. In this research study, we focus on

  • Pricing structures prevalent today
  • Market trends in adoption of different pricing structures
  • Factors impacting PO contract pricing
  • Best practices and recommendations for buyers and suppliers

Scope

  • Executive-level interviews with buyers and suppliers of PO services
  • Proprietary Everest database of nearly 150+ PO contracts

Contents

This report examines the various pricing structures in PO and provided in-depth analysis of the various factors affecting pricing in PO contracts. The report provides the reader with an accurate overview and clear identification of trends observed. For example, throughout the report key findings are shared, including the following, among others:

  • There is no "nirvana" to pricing strategy in PO, and every structure described has its own pros and cons in terms of how it impacts buyer behavior and supplier behavior
  • The managed-service fee is the most prevalent pricing structure in PO. The market is now maturing towards a hybrid pricing model based on a managed-service fee with a component of gain-sharing
  • Pure gain-sharing in PO contracts is rare. The rise of an FTE-based pricing structure is a recent phenomenon driven primarily by the FAO suppliers entering the PO market
  • The key factors that drive pricing strategies are process type and focus, buyer preferences and supplier preferences
  • In the PO market, there is a large variance in the pricing levels that is driven by various factors such as contractual elements (deal size and duration), process scope, buyer operations and delivery region

RELATED RESEARCH

PO in Financial Services: From Wall Street to Martin Place - Unlocking Value from the Savings Goldmine
Financial Services has been at the forefront of outsourcing and offshoring but PO adoption is relatively low. Historically procurement did not attract enough attention among financial services buyers. As a result, procurement is generally understaffed and underinvested. This research takes a look at the impact of the current financial turmoil on adoption of PO services by financial services and provides Everest's outlook for the market. | More

PO Technology Models: Creating Solutions That Deliver Value
Procurement technology is playing an important role in driving the Procurement Outsourcing (PO) market. The PO technology landscape is aligned to the two broad divisions in the PO market, sourcing and Procure-to-Pay (P2P). The market is primarily served by packaged solutions like ERP and procurement-specific Commercially-Off-The Shelf (COTS) products. PO suppliers are also investing aggressively in developing technology capabilities to deliver sustainable cost. | More

Global PO Supplier Landscape
As the Procurement Outsourcing (PO) market gains momentum, a new value proposition is emerging that represents a convergence of traditional PO and the traditional Finance and Accounting (FAO) value levers. Consequently, the supplier mix in today's PO market is changing rapidly in terms of type of offerings, delivery capabilities, and market success. | More